THE TWO THINGS THAT I REALLY LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S BLOG, WAS HOW THE LENGTH OF IT WASN’T TOO LONG, OR TOO SHORT. IT GOT STRAIGHT TO THE POINT AND EXPLAINED THOUROGHLY WHAT SHE WANTED TO GET THROUGH TO THE AUDIENCE. ANOTHER THING THAT I LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S POST WAS THE DETAIL THAT SHE GAVE IN HER POST. SHE DIDN’T GIVE TONS AND TONS OF DEATIL, SO AS TO JUMBLE UP (CONFUSE) HER READERS. SHE GAVE JUST THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF INFORMATION TO KEEP THE READER ENGAGAGED AND NOT BORED. WHAT I LIKED ABOUT SOFIA’S POST, WAS THAT SHE GAVE AN EXPLATION ON THE PERSON SHE WAS WRITING ABOUT, WHICH HAPPENED TO BE PICASSO. SHE GAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PERSON SO THAT YOU KNEW WHAT SHE WAS TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO YOU. I ALSO LIKED HOW SOFIA INCORPARATED FACTUAL INFORMATION. YOU COULD TELL THAT THEY WERE FACTS AND NOT JUST HER OWN KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS WHY THESE WERE MY FAVORITE BLOG POSTS.
i dont like them that much but.....here you go!!!
Monday, April 9, 2012
FAVORITE BLOG POSTS
MY TWO FAVORITE BLOG POSTS WERE GUADALUPE’S AND SOFIA’S. I LIKED GUADALUPE’S BECAUSE IT HAD A LOT OF THIOUGHT TO IT. I THINK THAT IT SHOWED THAT SHE WAS THOUGHTFUL OF THE THINGS THAT SHE PUT IN THE POST, BECAUSE IT GOT STRAIGHT TO THE POINT. I LIKED HOW IT DIDN’T CONFUSE YOU BY GIVING YOU SO MUCH DETAIL AND MAKING IT ALL INTO ONE PARAGRAPH. IN SOFIA’S BLOG I REALLY LIKED HOW HER BLOG WAS LONG, BUT NOT FULL OF OTHER RANDOM DETAILS THAT SHE COULD PUT INTO IT. THE POST WAS ACTUALLY FULL OF INFORMATION. I LEARNED A LOT IN THE POST. FOR AN EXAMPLE OF THIS IS WHAT I LEARNED ON PICASSO’S LIFE AS AN ARTIST. IT WAS VERY INFORMATIONAL. AND FULL OF DETAIL .
THE TWO THINGS THAT I REALLY LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S BLOG, WAS HOW THE LENGTH OF IT WASN’T TOO LONG, OR TOO SHORT. IT GOT STRAIGHT TO THE POINT AND EXPLAINED THOUROGHLY WHAT SHE WANTED TO GET THROUGH TO THE AUDIENCE. ANOTHER THING THAT I LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S POST WAS THE DETAIL THAT SHE GAVE IN HER POST. SHE DIDN’T GIVE TONS AND TONS OF DEATIL, SO AS TO JUMBLE UP (CONFUSE) HER READERS. SHE GAVE JUST THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF INFORMATION TO KEEP THE READER ENGAGAGED AND NOT BORED. WHAT I LIKED ABOUT SOFIA’S POST, WAS THAT SHE GAVE AN EXPLATION ON THE PERSON SHE WAS WRITING ABOUT, WHICH HAPPENED TO BE PICASSO. SHE GAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PERSON SO THAT YOU KNEW WHAT SHE WAS TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO YOU. I ALSO LIKED HOW SOFIA INCORPARATED FACTUAL INFORMATION. YOU COULD TELL THAT THEY WERE FACTS AND NOT JUST HER OWN KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS WHY THESE WERE MY FAVORITE BLOG POSTS.
NOW AFTER READING THESE TWO BLOGS, I WILL TRY TO IMPROVE ON THE LENGTH OF MY BLOG POSTS. AND ALSO ON ALL THE DETAILS I GIVE AND IF I GIVE ANY DETAILS AT ALL. I ALSO NOW KNOW THAT I SHOULD GIVE FACTUAL INFORMATION AND NOT JUST THE INFORMAION I KNOW, BECAUSE IT MIGHT NOT EVEN BE RIGHT. THIS IS WHAT I WILL DO NOW TO TRY AND IMPROVE MY BLOG POSTS THIS YEAR.
THE TWO THINGS THAT I REALLY LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S BLOG, WAS HOW THE LENGTH OF IT WASN’T TOO LONG, OR TOO SHORT. IT GOT STRAIGHT TO THE POINT AND EXPLAINED THOUROGHLY WHAT SHE WANTED TO GET THROUGH TO THE AUDIENCE. ANOTHER THING THAT I LIKED ABOUT GUADALUPE’S POST WAS THE DETAIL THAT SHE GAVE IN HER POST. SHE DIDN’T GIVE TONS AND TONS OF DEATIL, SO AS TO JUMBLE UP (CONFUSE) HER READERS. SHE GAVE JUST THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF INFORMATION TO KEEP THE READER ENGAGAGED AND NOT BORED. WHAT I LIKED ABOUT SOFIA’S POST, WAS THAT SHE GAVE AN EXPLATION ON THE PERSON SHE WAS WRITING ABOUT, WHICH HAPPENED TO BE PICASSO. SHE GAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PERSON SO THAT YOU KNEW WHAT SHE WAS TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO YOU. I ALSO LIKED HOW SOFIA INCORPARATED FACTUAL INFORMATION. YOU COULD TELL THAT THEY WERE FACTS AND NOT JUST HER OWN KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS WHY THESE WERE MY FAVORITE BLOG POSTS.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment